Darrik Spaude
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Darrik SpaudeKeymaster
From what I heard, the xDot developer guide should be available soon if not by tomorrow morning:
http://www.multitech.net/developer/products/multiconnect-dot-series/multiconnect-xdot/
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterAt what voltage are the mDots being powered?
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterHi Andrew,
According to our developers, the “RTC initialization failed” message has only been seen after flashing new firmware. A hard reset by removing power from the device has allowed the RTC to be initialized properly.
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterHi Andrew,
I’m dredging up this old case to ask a question. When you were seeing this problem, were you always using Deep Sleep? Or were you seeing it in both Sleep and Deep Sleep?
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterI’ve sent the link to this thread to our sales team.
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterHi Kyle,
Log into the Support Portal (same credentials as multitech.net) and create a support case requesting the STEP file. Please specify the model you are interested in (MTQ-H5?).
https://support.multitech.com/
Thanks,
DarrikDarrik SpaudeKeymasterThere isn’t an ETA yet. I believe part of the wait is related to LoRa Alliance and when specs will be finalized for other bands.
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterHi David,
I don’t believe there is currently a way to limit the channels to avoid interference. We have a feature request to add support for other bands. It is on the list for one of the next releases.
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterHi Anthony,
You will need at least pin 1 on the mDot connected to VDD (5V or 3.3V). The programming header doesn’t have VDD input. See the developer guide for more info on pin locations. VDD should be sourced from a supply with the same ground reference as that of pin 25 (GND) (e.g. jumper pin 1 of X11 on MTUDK2 to pin 1 on the mDot).
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterFor instructions to flash from mLinux to AEP, please create a support case at our Support Portal ( https://support.multitech.com ).
December 28, 2015 at 3:41 pm in reply to: mt100eocg unit spontaneously resets to default network configuration #10647Darrik SpaudeKeymasterKlaus created a support case, but unfortunately we have not seen this problem and we are not sure what is causing it. Klaus wondered if the recommended solution [is] to add a bitbake append recipe to the “config” recipe in order to ensure the defaults corresponds to whatever settings we would like. Our response was, yes, try that.
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterHi David,
I recommend that you take a look at the AT command guide found on the page for your product:
http://www.multitech.com/models/92506902LF
Take a look at the section on “DTE Modem Interface Control” (starting on page 35). ATQ0 would “quiet result codes.” ATE0 would disable echo. ATV0 would use terse responses rather than verbose responses.
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterJust adding this information for others who might be searching for similar answers:
As of this date (12/9/2015), MultiTech does not have support for other frequency bands. We will add support after it becomes part of the LoRaWAN specification.
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterI believe the resolution worked out through our Support Portal was:
–Disable (uncheck) “public” in the Conduit’s LoRa configuration since the mDot’s “public network” was set to off. These settings need to match.Darrik SpaudeKeymasterHi Jim,
The MTDOT-EVB is sampling, but it is not released. It will be released with documentation around Feb. 2016.
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterHi Eric,
Right now there are no plans to update the utility used to fill in the cover pages to support PDF docs above v1.4. I’ve added your request to an existing internal feature request so that the product managers see your request.
Best Regards,
DarrikDarrik SpaudeKeymasterIf you are planning on using DeviceHQ, then you should consider the 210A model instead. If not, then consider creating a support case at https://support.multitech.com/ (use the same MultiTech ID at the Support Portal as here on multitech.net).
Best Regards,
DarrikDarrik SpaudeKeymasterHi Ed,
Which model do you have? The AEP model has a web interface, but the mLinux model does not. The AEP model includes “210A” in the model name while the mLinux model includes “210L” in the model name.
Best Regards,
DarrikDarrik SpaudeKeymasterSince the time I wrote my comment in March 2015, the Product Managers have decided to discontinue the iSMS line. Right now the iSMS is in the “Near End-of-Life” state. We had talked about being able to create a 3G replacement card, but that idea was rejected.
If there is enough demand heard through the sales group (e.g. customers contact MultiTech Sales), then the Product Managers may take another look at it.
Sorry,
DarrikDarrik SpaudeKeymasterHi Joe,
Here are a few discovery questions:
1. How many simultaneous incoming/outgoing fax lines are required?
2. Will the FaxFinder be connected to a phone system?
a. Which phone system?
b. How many analog station ports are available?
c. Are there additional DID numbers to use for fax numbers?
d. Are they interested in purchasing additional DIDs to come in on their existing PRI/T1?
3. If not connecting to a phone system, how many analog PSTN lines are available?
4. Will the FaxFinder be connected to an IP PBX rather than analog PSTN ports on a PBX?
5. Are there different departments that need their own dedicated ports/channels?
6. Is the fax server being shared between businesses?Regarding the number of ports or channels, here is a chart that should help.
For FaxFinder Analog (pages sent/received daily*):
Up to 960 pages, use FF240.R1 2 port
Up to 1,920 pages, use FF440.R1 4 port
Up to 2,880 pages, use FF840.R1 8 port
Up to 3,840 pages, use FF840.R1 8 port
— For more ports, can expand using FFEX8 (extra 8 analog ports), or FFEX16 (extra 16 analog ports) up to a total number of 24 analog ports for the FaxFinder Analog.
— http://www.multitech.com/brands/faxfinderFor FaxFinder IP (pages sent/received daily*):
Up to 960 pages, use FF240-IP-2.R1 with 2 channels
Up to 1,920 pages, use FF240-IP-2.R1 with 4 channel
Up to 2,880 pages, use FF240-IP-2.R1 with 6 channel
Up to 3,840 pages, use FF240-IP-2.R1 with 8 channel
— FF240-IP-2.R1 can support up to 24 channels. Channels can be added in increments of 2 or multiples of 2 up to a total of 24 channels.
— http://www.multitech.com/brands/faxfinder-ip* Conservative calculation based on 60 KB page transmitted at 9600 baud. FaxFinder fax servers utilize Super G3 V.34 fax technology providing fax speeds up to 33.6K bps. So actual pages transmitted may be higher depending on line/network conditions at premises, between sender and receiver, and at receiver premises.
Let us know if you have more questions.
DarrikDarrik SpaudeKeymasterI recommend you create a Support Portal case and include all of the affected serial numbers.
https://support.multitech.com/
Thanks,
DarrikDarrik SpaudeKeymasterHi Nick,
Use the following command on the MultiConnect OCG products (MTCDP-x and MT100EOCG-x):
mts-id-eeprom –in-file /sys/devices/platform/i2c-gpio/i2c-0/0-0056/eeprom
Look for the device-id and that is the serial number.
For the new Conduit products (MTCDT-x), use the following command:
mts-io-sysfs show device-id
Best Regards,
DarrikDarrik SpaudeKeymasterI’ve created an internal request regarding each of the topics mentioned above. However, I don’t have a timeline when each would be addressed.
Thanks for the feedback. We do want to make it easier for our customers to use the product. This is one of those areas that has come up a few times in our Support Portal as well.
Best Regards,
DarrikAugust 25, 2015 at 12:12 pm in reply to: AT+CSQ always returns bit error rate of 99 on MTSMC-C2-GP? #8906Darrik SpaudeKeymasterThe following was already posted in our Support Portal, but I will add it here in case others have the same question:
For the CDMA (our C2) radio, the second parameter in +CSQ is the frame error rate (
) as a percentage. For AT+CSQ, if the is 99, then assume no errors detected as long as there is a signal strength reported. If +CSQ is 99,99, then the =99 means the frame error rate is truly unknown. The command #CAI? also includes the
along with , but in this command’s response is an integer rather than a percentage. Example #1 (third number from right in #CAI? response is
integer value and corresponds to second value in +CSQ response — here integer=0 and percentage=99 (undetectable)):
at#cai?
#CAI: 299,102,2441,4,384,256,6,6,6,-97,-12,0,2,0,0,0,2,0,0,0OK
at+csq
+CSQ: 4,99OK
Example #2 (third number from right in #CAI? response is
integer value and corresponds to second value in +CSQ response — here integer=513 and percentage=6 — integer=416 and percentage=6):
at+csq
+CSQ: 5,6OK
at#cai?
#CAI: 299,102,2713,4,384,88,6,6,6,-98,-10,-13,4,1,1,3,2,513,0,0OK
at+csq
+CSQ: 6,6OK
at#cai?
#CAI: 299,102,2713,4,384,88,6,6,6,-97,-7,-11,4,1,1,3,2,416,0,0OK
The C2 AT command guide is here and includes +CSQ and #CAI:
–> http://www.multitech.com/manuals/s000546.pdfDarrik SpaudeKeymasterHi Herraiz,
I just wanted to chime in. Based on the RomBOOT message you get, I think the section “Installing Atmel SAM-BA Utility” is the one to follow. I don’t believe you need to make any hardware modifications. The SAM-BA utility monitors for special characters on the debug port. If you were NOT getting the RomBOOT message, then the bootstrap would be okay but U-boot would be failing and that is probably where the hardware modification is necessary. The RomBOOT message is coming directly from the Ateml processor’s ROM.
Regarding where the files are located, I’ll let Bryan help you with that.
Best Regards,
DarrikDarrik SpaudeKeymasterHi Kirk,
I’ve created a feature request in our Support Portal on your behalf.
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterHi John,
Some of the carriers have already announced plans to shut down 2G networks over the next few years. However, some carriers find that they can offer services to low-bandwidth customers, so it is hard to know which carrier will want to keep it live and which will for sure disable support.
The current iSMS line (SFx00-G) only supports 2G networks. However, our Escalation group is looking into what it would take to create a 3G-capable model (we know it will involve a hardware change, but we don’t know how much time will be needed to make the software changes).
When we have some more information I’ll try to remember to write back to this thread. I’ll copy this thread’s URL into the task we’ve set up for the investigation so that we see it.
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterFernando,
If you log in to our support portal, then I could add you to that case too, but right now your account hasn’t been created on the portal (same login as this site). If you don’t want to be added, then that is fine. We’re still working on the case.
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterWhat is the case number?
Darrik SpaudeKeymasterFernando,
If you would log in to our Support Portal (support.multitech.com), then I will create a case on your behalf with this information. I think we’ll want some screen shots.
-
AuthorPosts