Andrew Lindsay

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 129 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: DevStatusReq on xDot #26871
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Thanks Jason, that was what I was hoping. Checking with network provider as they only send the status requests twice a day.

    thanks

    Andrew

    in reply to: xDot and IN865 Channel Plan #23649
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Thanks for the update.

    Andrew

    in reply to: Question about xDOT #20616
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    I think you might be misunderstanding what LoRa can do. From your description you seem to suggest the xDot is being used as a serial link replacement and can receive and transmit at will. This is not the case.

    You would have to buffer data, send it out, receive any response and wait for the next available transmission window before you can send more data.

    Andrew

    in reply to: Device ID reset to 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 #20566
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Hi Darrik,

    the device is operational again thanks.

    Andrew

    in reply to: xDot Analog inputs not restored after sleep #20557
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Seems this issue has already been reported on developer.mbed.org forum with a workaround that seems to work.

    https://developer.mbed.org/questions/78300/xDot-ADC-problem-when-coming-out-of-slee/

    Thanks

    Andrew

    in reply to: Antenna ideas for the mDot? #20548
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    If you’ve got the screw connector (SMA-RP) then you just need the antenna to screw on, the Pulse Electronics W1063 is the one that Multitech have been supplying with the Conduit gateways and I’ve used it with those mDots.

    Andrew

    in reply to: Antenna ideas for the mDot? #20540
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant
    in reply to: Device ID reset to 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 #20521
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Got a binary image from support but it doesnt give any output so back to where I was – A failed xDot that is now unusable on a custom board that is now scrap.

    Andrew

    in reply to: Device ID reset to 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 #20516
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Do you have a utility that allows me to fix this issue that you can share with me?

    Thanks

    Andrew

    in reply to: Device ID reset to 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 #20514
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Hi Peter,

    EEPROM is used, I use the functions within the library to read and write to it. Only around 365 bytes are used to hold device configuration parameters that a used can set via a bluetooth app. These start from address 0 and have been this way for some time before the device decided to erase its device id.

    Are there specific locations that hold the device configuration? I’m sure the library would block access to these locations.

    Andrew

    in reply to: Device ID reset to 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 #20497
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Hi Peter,

    Multitech provided a utility for the mDot that allowed the device ID to be reset after flash corruption. I wasn’t aware the xDots suffer from the same problem.

    I’ve raised a support ticket.

    thanks

    Andrew

    in reply to: Transitioning from 915MHz to 868MHz firmware #20282
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Slightly related, is it possible to change a 868MHz xDot to a 915MHz part by running a custom firmware image that updates some internal EEPROM values as I could do with the mDots after the flash had been corrupted?

    Reason is that I cannot get hold of 915MHz parts for a US based project and apparently the factory don’t have enough available for another month.

    Thanks

    Andrew

    in reply to: NRESET PIN Connection #20281
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Hi,
    I use a 10K resistor pullup and a 100nF capacitor between NRESET and Ground. If you then add a reset button you then connect it between NRESET and Ground.

    Thanks

    Andrew

    in reply to: xDot wont start issues #20267
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    OK, update now. I did a bit of reorganising the way the different parts get initialised and this seems to have fixed it for now.

    Cheers

    Andrew

    in reply to: xDot wont start issues #19887
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Not been able to produce a simple application that demonstrates this. I thought it had gone away but seems to be back. Any tips on debugging this other than removing and adding bits of code to see where it fails?

    thanks

    Andrew

    in reply to: xDot wont start issues #19784
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    I was using the last stable libxDot-mbed5 and this had issues so tried the latest libxDot-dev-mbed5 (including your recent fixes today) with the correct release of mbed-os for each.

    other libraries include are for DS18B20 and another I2C battery monitor device.

    Cheers

    Andrew

    in reply to: libxDot-dev-mbed5 frequency band #19778
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Thanks Mike, they are in the ChannelPlan.h file now so I’ve still got to make changes to use them.

    Andrew

    in reply to: xDot Bootloader #18250
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    OK, thanks.

    in reply to: problem with low votage #17696
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    I’ve been looking at the changelog and is shows that libmdot-mbed5 2.0.16 has the fix, but the revision details for libmdot-mbed5 show it is only at release 2.0.15:

    Revision 57:610f9e955516
    mdot-library revision 2.0.15 and mbed-os revision mbed-os-5.1.5

    Can you confirm this fix is in the production release or that it is only currently available in the dev version of the library? If only available in the dev library, when is it scheduled to be pushed into the production library?

    thanks

    Andrew

    in reply to: xDot/mDot UART differences #17286
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Thanks Peter, I’ve got it connected fine as I’ve used a regular FTDI cable to test it.

    Andrew

    in reply to: xDot/mDot UART differences #17237
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Yes, xdot is on the dev board, doing some evaluations before committing to a design. So far the xDot is losing out to other manufacturers. Its latest mbed-os and I also tried the latest mbed 2 but that wont compile for xdot anyway.

    Pins on both devices are UART_TX and UART_RX on the xDot. I’ll check the rest and try again later. Not able to look just yet.

    Thanks

    Andrew

    in reply to: xDot/mDot UART differences #17233
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Its the UART1 interface I’m using on the xDot not the USB interface.

    in reply to: Ultrasonic Sensor #17230
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    The Maxbotix sensors have a number of interfaces, Analog, PWM, Serial or I2C. I’ve successfully used the Maxbotix sensors using the PWM option. The MB7137 uses I2C which will be fairly trivial to interface to the mDot. There are 2 commands, one to tell the sensor to take a reading, the other to retrieve the reading as 2 bytes of data.

    Regards

    Andrew

    in reply to: mtxdot solder pads #16809
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Other manufacturers are using the same sort of footpints, I know of one that has the same functionality as the xDot in a package that is 1/4 size at only 12mm x 12mm!

    They aren’t designed to be hand soldered. Our design s being finalised ready for prototype production in the next few weeks.

    Andrew

    in reply to: I2C issues with libmdot-mbed os5 #16058
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Hi Leon,

    Thanks for the response. Trying 5.1.4 and I’m able to talk to the devices.

    Cheers

    Andrew

    in reply to: DFRobot Leonardo w/XBee Socket and MDot #15890
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    If you are only using the factory firmware or programming the mDots in a UDK dev board then most xbee based boards should work. As I’ve not tried this myself, I’m only comparing the pinouts.

    thanks

    Andrew

    in reply to: RTC Wakeup from sleep #15620
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    Thanks,

    Are you saying there is currently, when using sleep, no way to determine if it was the RTC or wakeup pin that caused the mDot to come out of sleep mode.

    Andrew

    in reply to: Deep Sleep Mode and MDot LORA configuration. #15611
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    It can be frustrating at times….When I get a spare day I may even tackle mbed-os5!!!

    Thanks for your continued support Mike and the guys.

    Andrew

    in reply to: Deep Sleep Mode and MDot LORA configuration. #15603
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    OK, thanks Mike for this. Documentation is key.

    I’ve tested some new code using the Dot examples sleep and I/O configuration, I’m now seeing less than 50uA so an improvement.

    Regards

    Andrew

    in reply to: Deep Sleep Mode and MDot LORA configuration. #15593
    Andrew Lindsay
    Participant

    I decided to do some tests on this comparing deep sleep libmDot to the sleep only crippled libmDot. There seem to be some interesting results.

    libmDot 15:b50f92f when using deep sleep – 75-90uA.
    libmDot 17:0da384b+ When using sleep – 130uA.
    libmDot 17:0da384b+ When using deep sleep and get warning – 42uA

    If selecting deep sleep is producing the warning saying it is using sleep instead of deep sleep, then why does it show a much lower power consumption that when sleep is selected?

    The 42uA was not consistent as sometimes when it entered sleep mode via the deep sleep warning it failed to reduce the power consumption at all and stayed above the normal 6mA or more.

    I’m going to repeat the tests again in the morning and try a number of mDots to see if this is the same on them all.

    Thanks

    Andrew

Viewing 30 posts - 1 through 30 (of 129 total)